Single judge admitted a counter affidavit and vakalatnamas, noted appearances of other advocates, directed notice to certain respondents, and listed the writ petition for future proceedings on 10.12.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7487 of 2024
Petitioner :- Basir Ahmad And 25 Others Respondent :- First Addl. District And Session Judge Bahraich And 36 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijai Bahadur Verma,Aditya Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Amit Pandey,Ashish Raman Mishra,Avneesh Singh,Rakesh Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Counter affidavit filed by Sri Ashish Raman Mishra, Advocate in the Court today is taken on record.
Vakalatnama(s) filed by Sri Ashish Raman Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 to 15, 25 to 28 and 33 & 34 in the Court today are taken on record. He is already appearing in this case for the respondent No. 24.
Record shows that Sri Amit Pandey, Advocate is appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 16 to 23, Sri Rakesh Pratap Singh, Advocate is appearing for the respondent No. 29 and Sri Avneesh Singh, Advocate is appearing for the respondent No. 35.
Taking note of the aforesaid, Office is directed to submit its report regarding service of notice upon respondent Nos. 30 to 32 and 36 & 37 by the next date of listing.
List/put up this case on 10.12.2024.
By the next date of listing, learned counsel for the petitioners, if so chooses, may file rejoinder affidavit.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024
Arun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Basir Ahmad and 25 Others
First Addl. District And Session Judge Bahraich and 36 Others
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
