The order does not decide any substantive issue; it merely lists the matter for further proceedings on a specific date and clarifies that pendency does not constitute a stay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 542 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashutosh Shukla And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Devendra Nath Pandey,Laxmi Narayan Gupta
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
Counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record.
A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 vehemently opposes the request made on behalf of the petitioners.
In the interest of justice, list this case on 02.05.2024.
It is clarified that mere pendency of the instant petition shall not be construed as stay of any proceedings before the trial court.
Order Date :- 19.4.2024 Shravan
Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ashutosh Shukla And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
