Contempt application alleging non-compliance of an order; counsel for the applicant submitted the order had been complied with. The court held the application had lost efficacy and dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30835
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1186 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt. Shubham Opposite Party :- Sri Anand Prakash Rai, Naib Tehsildar, Milkipur, District Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 19.4.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Shubham
Sri Anand Prakash Rai, Naib Tehsildar, Milkipur, District Ayodhya
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
