Jay Karan v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal adjourned. No counsel appeared for the appellant owing to a bar association abstention from judicial work; the State Counsel was present. The court listed the appeal afresh on 04.12.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9373 of 2024
Appellant :- Jay Karan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- A Kumar Srivastava,Rafiqa Anees Khan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the appellant to address the Court, whereas learned State Counsel is present.
It is pointed out by learned State Counsel that pursuant to Resolution dated 03.11.2024 of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, counsel are abstaining from judicial work.
Let the matter be listed on 04.12.2024 as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.11.2024 Kashifa
Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jay Karan
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/9373/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court