This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for time to undergo eye treatment during pendency of proceedings was dismissed as it was misconceived. The court noted the eye operation had already taken place and the case is at final arguments.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. rejected on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:155387
Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32006 of 2024 Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kant Dubey,Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 23.9.2024 /safi
Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the trial court to grant time for the applicant's eye treatment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kumar
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
