Criminal Appeal against a summoning order was disposed of without appreciating grounds due to lack of substantive issues. The impugned order was remanded for expeditious disposal and coercive actions were stayed until the report.
The summoning order remanded to be expedited; coercive action stayed pending disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:144512
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5052 of 2024
Appellant :- Asif Iqbal And 3 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Manish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
504, 506 I.P.C. and sections 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Ecotech III, District- Gautam Buddha Nagar and expedite and finalize it preferably within a year from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Asif Iqbal And 3 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
