Criminal Appeal assailing a cognizance order under SC/ST Act. Court observed that factual matrix of consecutive FIRs cannot be adjudicated at this stage but appellants have liberty to seek remedies.
Appeal disposed of with liberty to the appellants to avail remedies available at law before the concerned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120390
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1702 of 2024
Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar Patel And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Dharamraj Singh,Kush Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Akhilesh,G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
adjudicated while considering the illegality, if involved in the order impugned which gives rise to cause of action in filing the instant appeal at the behest of the appellants, but at the same time, it is observed that the appellants will be at liberty to avail remedies available at law before the court concerned.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Karan
Digitally signed by :- KUMAR KARAN RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of cognizance is illegal due to multiple FIRs for the same incident.
Whether the appellate court should adjudicate the factual matrix of the FIRs.
Whether the appellant should have remedies available at law.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Kumar Patel And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
