Azad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 13
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3100 of 2024
Appellant :- Azad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Appellant :- Arjun Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
- Vakalatnama filed by Sri Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate alongwith Sri Vaibhav Srivastava, Advocate, on behalf of complainant in the Court today is taken on record. He prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file response in the present appeal.
- Admit.
- Summon the trial court record.
- Steps be taken within seven working days.
- Learned AGA is also directed to file response to the applicant seeking suspension of sentence and enlarging the appellant on bail and also to this appeal within a period of three weeks.
- One weeks' time thereafter shall be available to appellant's counsel to file rejoinder affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Azad
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Saurabh Lavania
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3100/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Firoj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow
Mohammad Rafeek @ Mohd. Rafeek Qureshi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Mohammad Khalil vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others
Complainant / Victim of Case Crime No. 25 /2018 vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others