Vijendra Kumar Saroj v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-window order admitting Criminal Appeal No. 2316 of 2024 regarding a bail application. The court granted the State three weeks to file objections.
What did the court decide?
Three weeks time granted to the Respondent State to file objection against the bail application.
What the court decided
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2316 of 2024
Appellant :- Vijendra Kumar Saroj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko Counsel for Appellant :- Rishad Murtaza,Aishwarya Mishra,Arnnav Prakash Tikku,Syed Ali Jafar Rizvi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- Admit.
- Summon the trial court record.
- Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file objection against the bail application.
- Response, if any, may be filed by the appellant within a week thereafter.
- List in the month of September, 2024.
[Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vijendra Kumar Saroj
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Attau Rahman Masoodi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2316/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. vs Vipin Kumar Gupta and Another
Premshankar Dwivedi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Smt. Pooja Thru. Her Father Ravindra Kumar @ Ramendra Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. and Others
Manoj Kumar Nau vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.