The court allowed the appellant's application for bail during the pendency of his criminal appeal, noting the heavy pendency, lack of criminal history, and contradictions in witness statements, without prejudging the merits of the case.
Appellant released on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1192 of 2024
Appellant :- Dhaniram Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Jai Prakash Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order on Application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
Order on Appeal
List in due course.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to bail during the pendency of the criminal appeal?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dhaniram Upadhyay
State Of Up And 3 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
