Disposed

Hashim v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Jul 2024CRLA/6284/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST Act challenging cognizance orders. The Court directed that if the appellants surrender within 30 days, their bail applications must be considered expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil, staying coercive action during this period.

What did the court decide?

Directing trial court to consider bail expeditiously upon surrender within 30 days; coercive action stayed for 30 days.

Hashim vs State of U.P. and Another — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:151343

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6284 of 2024

¶4

Appellant :- Hashim Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Wahid Jamal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶7

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST Act') has been filed against the cognizance/summoning order dated 25.11.2019 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Aligarh in S.S.T. No.380 of 2019 (State v. Babar @ Shahrukh and others) as well as charge sheet dated 04.11.2019, arising out of Case Crime No.703 of 2019, under Sections 147, 452, 354-kha, 308, 323, 504, 506, 336 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(5Ka) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Quarsi, District Aligarh.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for appellants confined his prayer only to the extent that the present appeal may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case appellants surrender before it and apply for bail, their bail application may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) to which learned counsel for opposite parties have no objection.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, the instant criminal appeal is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the appellants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from today and apply

¶10

for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶11

However, it is made clear that till 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellants herein.

¶12

Order Date :- 17.9.2024 A.N. Mishra

¶13

Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hashim v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hashim v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Rikki and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vidit Jaiswal vs State of Up and Another

Satish Kumar vs State of Up and 5 Others

Monu and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Sanjeev Kumar vs State of Up and Another

Varsha and Another vs State of Up and 4 Others