Dayachand v. State of Up and 8 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Review application seeking reconsideration of an order declining interference with revenue authorities' orders; court found no good ground and dismissed the review.
Review application seeking reconsideration of an order declining interference with revenue authorities' orders; court found no good ground and dismissed the review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:153213
Court No. - 50
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 312 of 2024
Applicant :- Dayachand Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 8 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chitranshu Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Abhinav Singh,C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Heard Shri Chitranshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the review applicant and Shri Anil Kumar Yadav, Advocate, under the authority of Shri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 5. Shri Hari Kant Shukla, learned Sanding Counsel, has accepted notice on behalf of State respondents and Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no. 9, Gaon Sabha concerned.
This review petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 01.05.2024, passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 7355 of 2024. By the said order this court had declined to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the Revenue authorities.
Having heard learned counsel for the Review Applicant the Court finds no good ground to review its order.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 20.9.2024 Deepak/
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dayachand
State of UP
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court