A civil contempt application against a tehsildar was withdrawn by counsel seeking liberty to file a fresh application with a complete order-sheet of a Section 34 Land Revenue Act case; the court dismissed it as withdrawn with that liberty.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh contempt application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7239 of 2024
Applicant :- Malti Devi Opposite Party :- Sri Javed Ansari Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Ashish Pandey
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The counsel for the applicant prays that the application be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh application annexing complete order-sheet of the case registered under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901.
The contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed.
Order Date :- 21.11.2024 Vipasha
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malti Devi
Sri Javed Ansari Tehsildar
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
