Dismissed
Raghvendra Pratap Singh v. Sri Vinay Kumar Gupta, Ddc and 3 Others
Allahabad HCCAPL/6025/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this contempt application alleging noncompliance of a 1987 order regarding stay of dispossession, the court held that mere apprehension of dispossession did not constitute contempt. The court noted the 1987 order did not restrain preparation of CH Form-45, leading to dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Contempt application dismissed as no actual dispossession occurred and apprehension alone does not constitute contempt.