The applicant filed a civil contempt application alleging non-compliance with a High Court order passed in 2023. Upon reviewing the records and affidavit, the Court found no evidence of wilful disobedience by the impleaded Judicial Officer. The application was dismissed for lack of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:125314
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4503 of 2024
Applicant :- Satyaveer Singh Opposite Party :- Adarsh Kumar Singh Posted As Then Civil Judge (Jr.Division) Ftc And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kunwar Mayank Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the applicant.
The present contempt application has been filed pleading noncompliance of the order dated 20.4.2023 passed by this Court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 2888 of 2023.
From the records annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application, I do not find any wilful disobedience on the part of the Judicial Officer of the court concerned who has been impleaded as opposite party in the present case.
The contempt application is dismissed .
Order Date :- 5.8.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of the order dated 20.4.2023 by the Judicial Officer?
Satyaveer Singh
Salil Kumar Rai
Satyam Agrahari
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
