Contempt application; counsel for opposite party no. 3 filed vakalatnama and sought time to file compliance affidavit. Matter listed for week commencing 18.03.2024. No substantive decision taken.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 396 of 2024
Applicant :- Ratnesh Saxena Opposite Party :- Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Urban Development Govt. Nagar Vikas Anubahag, Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Saxena,Mridula Saxena
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Sri Prem Prakash Singh, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 3 and the same is taken on record.
Office is directed to print the name of Sri Prem Prakash Singh as counsel for opposite party no. 3 in the next cause list.
Learned counsel for opposite party no. 3 submits that he may be given a week time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list/put up this matter in the week commencing 18.03.2024.
Order Date :- 4.3.2024 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ratnesh Saxena
Amrit Abhijat, Prin. Secy. Urban Development Govt. Nagar Vikas Anubahag, Lko.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
