Banshu v. Shri Subhash Singh, S.D.M., Ambedkar Nagar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this non-dispositive order, the Court noted the absence of the respondent's counsel. The case was listed for a fresh hearing, with directions for the respondent to file a compliance affidavit or appear in person by the next date.
What the court decided
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3901 of 2024
Applicant :- Banshu Opposite Party :- Shri Subhash Singh, S.D.M., Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar,Aman Kumar Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
- The name of Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate is shown in the cause list as the counsel for the respondent. However, none appears on behalf the respondent.
2. List this case on 25.10.2024 as fresh.
- By the next date, the respondent shall file affidavit of compliance, failing which, he shall appear in person before this Court.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to communicate this order to Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, forthwith.
Order Date :- 1.10.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Banshu
- respondent
Shri Subhash Singh, S.D.M., Ambedkar Nagar
Coram
Rajeev Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/3901/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Maihar Cement (Merged With Ultratech Cement Ltd.) Thru. Authorized Signatory Rakesh Jaisalmeria vs State of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Anr.
Rakesh Kumar Soni @ Rinku vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another
Niyamat vs Sri Sanjay Mishra Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Distt. Gonda
Madhuri vs Shri Devanand Tiwari Tehsilsar Tehsil Lambhua, Sultanpur