Disposed

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Sri Siddharth Shankar Meena, S.P., Unnao and Another

Allahabad HC30 Aug 2024CAPL/3431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for contempt of court, the applicant alleged non-compliance with a stay order. The court listed the matter, directed the Additional Chief Standing Counsel to seek instructions on non-compliance, and directed the respondent to appear in person.

What did the court decide?

The opposite party no.2 shall appear in person on the next date with the complete case diary.

Ajay Kumar Gupta vs Sri Siddharth Shankar Meena, S.P… — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 17

¶2

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3431 of 2024 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Gupta Opposite Party :- Sri Siddharth Shankar Meena, S.P., Unnao And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar Mishra

¶3

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order dated 09.05.2024 passed by Writ Court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.3227 of 2024 in re; Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and Ors. has been willfully defied by the opposite parties. He further submits that on the basis of incorrect facts, F.I.R No.76/2024 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC P.S- Bangarmau, District- Unnao was lodged by one Pramod Kumar Singh due to annoyance that Kusum Rani Gupta and Madhuri Gupta have executed one power of attorney in favour of applicant. Thereafter, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.3227 of 2024 (supra) was filed by the applicant, in which, stay order was passed on 09.05.2024.

¶6

Order dated 09.05.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.3227 of 2024 (supra) is as under:

¶7

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the Staterespondent and perused the record. Both the writ petitions are decided by a common judgment.

¶8

The petitioners seek issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the First Information Report dated 11.03.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0076 of 2024 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police Station- Bangarmau, District- Unnao.

¶9

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the informant/respondent No.4 is belongs to a different branch of the family as in the very first line he says that petitioner Nos. 4 & 5 are daughters of late Girija Singh and he is cousin brother of late Girija Singh. In the entire FIR, there is no details of any property belonging to the informant which is usurped by the petitioners in any manner. The allegations are only with regard to the property of father of petitioner Nos. 4 & 5 from which informant has no concerned. It is further stated that there is also a civil dispute pending between the parties and only to pressurize the petitioners, present FIR has been lodged. Prima facie, a case for consideration is made out. Issue notice to opposite party no. 4. Let the pleadings be exchanged within four weeks.

¶10

Connect and list this case after four weeks alongwith Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.3283of 2024; Ajay Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. and others. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that till the next date of

¶11

listing, petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 11.03.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0076 of 2024 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police StationBangarmau, District- Unnao. The petitioners shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and get their statements recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when they are called. If they do not do so then it can be a ground for seeking vacation of this inter interim order. "

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the aforesaid order was passed after hearing the learned A.G.A. and the same was communicated to the competent authorities. Despite knowing this fact that there was an interim order passed by the Writ Court, on 15.08.2024, opposite party no.2 broke into the house of applicant along with otter police personnel and scolded his family members as well as threatened that the applicant will be arrested.

¶13

List this case on 19.09.2024 as fresh.

¶14

In the meantime, Shri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel shall seek instructions, as to why, the order of the Writ Court has not been complied with.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide a copy of the contempt application to Shri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, forthwith.

¶16

On the next date, opposite party no.2 shall appear in person before this Court along with the complete case diary.

¶17

Order Date :- 30.8.2024 V. Sinha

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Sri Siddharth Shankar Meena, S.P., Unnao and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Sri Siddharth Shankar Meena, S.P., Unnao and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jainendra Kumar vs Shri Kamta Ram Pal, Addl. Director, Basic Education, U.P. Prayagraj

Hari Shanker Agrawal vs Rajiv Kumar Srivastava, Unit Head (R.B), Iti Ltd., Raebareli and Another

Ram Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko and 2 Others

Shri Mahesh Kumar Nimbekar vs Dr. Sachin Kumar Verma, S.D.M., Tehsil-Sarojini Nagar, Lko.

Subhash Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Lko. and 2 Others

Sunil Kumar Singh vs Shri Abhishek Goyal, M.D., U.P. State Food and Essential Commodities Corporation Ltd., Lko.