The High Court allowed an interim prayer for time to seek instructions regarding non-compliance of a writ court order and directed the registry to list the Special Counsel for the respondent in the cause list; the application was listed as fresh.
Prayer for time granted; counsel listed as representing respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3119 of 2024
Applicant :- Anurag Dixit
Opposite Party :- Smt. Kalpana, Addl. Prin. Judge 2, Family Court Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shobhit Nigam,Piyush Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further time should be granted to the respondent to explain non-compliance with writ court directions.
Whether counsel for the High Court should be added to represent the respondent in contempt proceedings.
Anurag Dixit
Smt. Kalpana
Rajeev Singh
Vivek Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
