Contempt application alleging non-compliance of a writ court order. The respondent produced an order dated 17.09.2024 showing the applicants' representation had been decided. The court found the writ order complied with and dismissed the contempt application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64684
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3318 of 2024
Applicant :- Balak Ram Maurya And Others Opposite Party :- Shri Praveen Tiwari, Distt. Basic Education Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri
Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kr. Misra,Vipul Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
The copy of the order dated 17.09.2024 is taken on record.
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application survives after compliance of the writ court's order by the respondent.
Balak Ram Maurya And Others
Shri Praveen Tiwari, Distt. Basic Education Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
