Contempt application alleging the trial court disobeyed a writ order directing expedited conclusion of a complaint case. Court found no contempt, as counsel had never pointed out the expedite-disposal direction to the court below; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2703 of 2024
Applicant :- Ram Harakh Tiwari Opposite Party :- Pratibha Shukla, Presently Posted As Judicial Magistrate-Ii, Gonda, District-Gonda Counsel for Applicant :- Angrej Nath Shukla
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
2. Heard.
Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent committed willful disobedience of the court's order dated 1.5.2023 requiring expedited disposal of the complaint case?
Ram Harakh Tiwari
Pratibha Shukla, Judicial Magistrate-II, Gonda
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
