Contempt application dismissed as infructuous because the underlying writ order claimed by the applicant to have been complied with.
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47956
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1884 of 2024
Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Gupta Opposite Party :- Rajesh Kumar Prajapati, Secy. Administration U.P. Jal Nigam Rural Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Savita Jain Counsel for Opposite Party :- Samir Om
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vinod Kumar Gupta
Rajesh Kumar Prajapati
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
