Contempt application regarding non-compliance with a writ court direction. The court impleaded the Chief Engineer as respondent, noted the impugned order ignored the Supreme Court's C.P. Mundinamani decision, and directed an affidavit of compliance after revisiting that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2009 of 2024
Applicant :- Surya Bali Anand @ Sooryabali Anand Opposite Party :- Dr. Raj Shekhar, M.D., U.P. Jal Nigam Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kishor Pandey,Tanveer Ahmad Lari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent's order dated 15.07.2024 deciding the applicant's representation complied with the Supreme Court decision in C.P. Mundinamani as directed by the Writ Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
The Director (Admn. and HR) vs. C.P. Mundinamani and othersRelied on¶5
Civil Appeal No. 2471 of 2023
Surya Bali Anand @ Sooryabali Anand
Dr. Raj Shekhar, M.D., U.P. Jal Nigam Lko.
Sandeep Kumar, Chief Engineer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural)-6
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
