Petitioner withdrew a writ petition under Article 227 due to inadvertent omission of facts. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:37264
Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2061 of 2024
Petitioner :- Swami Ram Teerth Vidhyalaya Thru. Its Manager Sri Vivek Vikram Singh Respondent :- The Court Of Addl. Commissioner Administration And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to some inadvertent mistake, certain facts are left to be mentioned in the present writ petition which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present case and prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh.
Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh.
Order Date :- 15.5.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Swami Ram Teerth Vidhyalayu Thru. Its Manager Sri Vivek Vikram Singh
The Court Of Addl. Commissioner Administration And 3 Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
