The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench dismissed the bail cancellation application. The court held the application was misconceived as the applicant admitted no prior complaint was made to the trial court regarding alleged witness threats.
The bail cancellation application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64423
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 56 of 2024
Applicant :- Mohammad Arif Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajat Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
It is further submitted that as witnesses are also being threatened by the private respondent, the bail order dated 13.05.2021 may be cancelled.
It is admitted by learned counsel for the applicant that no any complaint about the threat given to the witnesses was ever made to the trial Court.
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail of an accused should be cancelled upon a posterior FIR alleging witness intimidation where no prior complaint was made to the trial court.
Whether the existence of new allegations of witness threat constitutes valid ground for quashing bail granted earlier.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Arif
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
