In a bail application regarding cheating and property mutation based on forged documents, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the plea, holding that sufficient evidence of forgery existed and no bail case was made out.
Prayer to enlarge applicant on bail was rejected and application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31509
Court No. - 8
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1625 of 2024 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajai Kumar,Vivek Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 22.4.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, a peon involved in property mutation based on forged documents, is entitled to bail.
Whether sufficient case for bail is made out given the evidence of forgery against the informant.
Whether the applicant faces reasonable fear of tampering with evidence or fleeing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
