Court dismissed an application for cancellation of bail granted to an accused in a POCSO case. The applicant alleged the victim was a minor, but the court noted she appeared 17.5 years old and a consenting party. Finding no cogent reasons, the bail order was affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 414 of 2024
Applicant :- Todi Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
appears that after considering entire facts of the case, court concerned granted bail to O.P. No.2 and, therefore, there is no illegality in bail granting order.
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 KK Patel
Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether cognent reasons exist to cancel bail granted to an accused in a POCSO case.
Whether the age of the victim below 18 years independently necessitates bail cancellation.
Todi Lal
State of U.P.
Krishn Kant Patel
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
