Allowed

Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2024BAIL/9864/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal bail application filed by Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla. The court considered the parity of co-accused who were released, the absence of a criminal history, and the fact that only one witness was examined, despite over a year of pre-trial detention. Bail was granted subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail by furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.

Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71563

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9864 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Shashank Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajai Kumar, Vivek Kumar Rai

¶6

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶8

2 . It is argued by the counsel for the applicant that the co-accused were enlarged on bail vide orders dated 30.01.2024 and 22.03.2024, as such, the applicant may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. It is further argued that the applicant is the husband and is in custody since 25.09.2023 and only one witness has been examined so far.

¶9

3. Learned A.G.A. as well as the learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail prayer.

¶10

4. Considering the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who have been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that only one witness has been examined so far, as such, there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in near future and the applicant has suffered pre trial detention of more than one year, the applicant who has no criminal history is enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶11

5. Let the applicant Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No. 651 of

¶12

2023, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow, on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 23.10.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Daya Shanker and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt. Lucknow and Others

Syed Bilal vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Anand Kunwar Shukla @ Anand Kunwar and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Consolidation Commissioner, Lucknow and Others

Kamlesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko

Ajay Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Idreesh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.