Ikram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned because the applicant's supplementary affidavit was not on record.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9340 of 2024
Applicant :- Ikram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed supplementary affidavit in the Registry, which is not on record.
List on 16.9.2024 as fresh along with supplementary affidavit.
Order Date :- 9.9.2024 kkb/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ikram
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Coram
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/9340/2024
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohammad Talha and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Taslim Khan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others
Akash Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others
Abhishek Dixit @ Monu Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another