Disposed

Taslim Khan and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2024A482/5686/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought quashing of a summoning order and charge-sheet under the Gangsters Act. Counsel did not press on merits and confined the prayer to liberty to file discharge applications with expeditious disposal and interim protection.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks, expeditious reasoned disposal thereof, and no coercive steps during pendency.

Taslim Khan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 13

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5686 of 2024 Applicant :- Taslim Khan And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Bhagwati Prasad Nigam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶5

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 24-01-2024 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court no.14/Special Judge, Gangester and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, District Hardoi in Case No. 76/2024 as well as the impugned charge sheet dated 04-09-2023 arisen out of Case Crime No. 51/2023 under section 2/3 U.P. Gangester and Anti social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 P.S. Manjhila, District Hardoi.

¶6

After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶8

In view of above, it is provided that applicants permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks' from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after

¶9

hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

¶10

Till the aforesaid period of four weeks' and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶11

In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶12

With above directions, this application stands disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 10.12.2024 V. Sinha

¶14

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Taslim Khan and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taslim Khan and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Manish Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another

Amit Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Gyan Prakash Upadhyaya vs State of U.P. Thru.Its Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home

Rakesh Thakur Alias Girjesh Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Avadhesh Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another