Allowed

Sameer Quraishi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home

Allahabad HC23 Jan 2024BAIL/810/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by a man detained after a non-bailable warrant was issued when he missed a court date while previously on bail. With no criminal history and an undertaking to attend trial, the court granted bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in FIR/Crime No.326 of 2019, Sections 307/34 IPC, P.S. Hasanganj, Unnao, on personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Sameer Quraishi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:41181

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 810 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sameer Quraishi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Of Home Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Maurya,Vikas Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant was on bail vide order dated 27.10.2020 passed by the learned trial court. However, as the applicant could not appear on one date, as such non bailable warrant was issued and the applicant has been detained in custody since 16.12.2023. The applicant ready to undertake that he will appear on each and every date before the concerned trial court and cooperate with the trial. Hence, the applicant who is in custody since 16.12.2023 having no criminal history, may be enlarged on bail.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid undertaking couple with the fact that the applicant who is languishing in jail since 16.12.2023 having no criminal history , I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to bail.

¶10

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Sameer Qureshi be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No.326 of 2019, under Sections 307/34 I.P.C., Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao on his furnishing personal bonds and two fresh reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶12

(a) The applicant shall furnish an undertaking

¶13

before the trial court to cooperate with the trial ; (b) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(d) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 29.5.2024

¶17

Shukla

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sameer Quraishi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sameer Quraishi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amrendra Kumar Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Jiyauddin Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Chhote Alias Samarpal Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home U.P. Government, Lucknow

Satya Prakash Mishra Alias Rahul Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. U.P. Lko.

Ravendra Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Priya Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another