Mohd. Irshad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for hearing; counter affidavit of the State taken on record, personal appearance of the Station House Officer dispensed with, rejoinder permitted, and matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4092 of 2024
Applicant :- Mohd. Irshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kamal Kishor Tiwari,Ankit Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed the counter affidavit, today in the Court, the same is taken on record.
3. Since the counter affidavit has been filed, therefore, there is no need for personal appearance of the Station House Officer concerned.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit within a period of ten days.
5. List this case in the week commencing 10.06.2024 within top ten case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Irshad
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/4092/2024
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sriram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry of Home, Lucknow and 2 Others
Ankit Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another
Mukul Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another
Rahul Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.