Partly allowed

Pramod Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Allahabad HC4 Mar 2024A482/2048/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed parties to verify a compromise deed before the trial court. Pending criminal proceedings were kept in abeyance for two months for verification and subsequently the petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings kept in abeyance for two months for verification of compromise; petition disposed upon direction for verification.

Pramod Kumar Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39287

¶2

Court No. - 15

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2048 of 2024 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. And Another

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Abdul Samad,Sunil Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Syed Mohammad Abid

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Syed Mohammad Abid learned Counsel for respondent no. 2.

¶7

Counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 6 to the petition. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the said compromise may be directed to be verified by the competent authority so that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of said compromise and its verification report.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has no objection to this innocuous prayer.

¶10

In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 07.06.2024 along with the copy of original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within one week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties.

¶11

For a period of two months, the proceedings arising out of case

¶12

crime No. 465/2022, under Sections 306 IPC, P.S. Dalmau, District Raebareli, pending in the Court of Learned IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Raebareli, shall be kept in abeyance.

¶13

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.

¶14

Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification.

¶15

Office is directed to return the original compromise as well as certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules of the Court.

¶16

Order Date :- 23.5.2024 R.C.

¶17

Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pramod Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Deepak Anand Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Baiteri Alias Abdul Khabeer Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. U.P. Lko.

Geeta @ Shiv Kumari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko.

Adesh Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Smt. Shiva Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Nitesh Singh (According to Aadhar Card Nitesh Kumar Singh) vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another