Raj Kumar @ Raju v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed bail application challenging a F.I.R. and quashed the FIR.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:44970
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 397 of 2024
Applicant :- Raj Kumar @ Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Aakash Srivastava,Ajeet Kumar Singh,Apoorv Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
- The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.533 of 2023 under sections 304, 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Hardoi.
- It is argued that arising out of the same case crime number, co accused Shyama has been enlarged on bail by this Court. Hence, the applicant who is languishing in jail since 18.10.2023 having no criminal history, may be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
- Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not deny the ground of parity.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with his co-accused who has already been released on bail from the same case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Raj Kumar @ Raju
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/397/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court