Allowed

Satyapal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2024/9283/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, the High Court allowed the petition, holding that the applicant, having suffered full sentences in related cases and having a co-accused granted bail, is not a flight risk.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each subject to standard conditions.

Satyapal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:3424

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9283 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Satyapal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghunath Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.26 of 2022 under section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Lonar, District Hardoi.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that three cases have been shown in the Gang Chart, out of which in one of case, the applicant has been granted bail and in other two cases shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant after conviction has already suffered the entire sentence. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in two other cases, in which the applicant has already suffered the sentence. It has also been argued that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 22.04.2022 in Bail No.3927 of 2022. The applicant is in jail since 02.02.2022. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in one of the case shown in the Gang Chart and in other cases shown against him, he has already suffered the entire sentence, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Satyapal be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the

¶13

hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 11.1.2024

¶17

VNP/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Satyapal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyapal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harshendra Singh @ Raja Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Shyam Bihari @ Shyam Kishor Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Prajapati Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Kailash Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Rajendra Gupta Third Bail Vs State of U.P.

Babu Ram Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.