Allowed

Pradeep v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2024BAIL/325/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application for bail granted on the ground of parity with a co-accused already released. The applicant, having no criminal antecedents and facing similar allegations, was ordered released on personal bond and two surety bonds with conditions to appear in court and not interfere with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail upon execution of personal bond and furnishing two sureties of like amount each with specified conditions.

Pradeep vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:46657

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 325 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Pradeep Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seek enlargement on bail in FIR/Case Crime No.533 of 2023, under Sections 304, 323, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Hardoi.

¶8

It is argued that the co-accused Raj Kumar @ Raju with similar role, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 2.7.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc Bail Application No.397 of 2024. Hence, the applicant who is languishing in jail since 16.9.2023 having no criminal history, may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer but could not deny the ground of parity.

¶10

Considering the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co accused who has been granted bail by this Court and adopting the same reasoning as contained in the bail order dated 2.7.2024 passed in the case of co accused coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 16.9.2023, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant Pradeep be released on bail in the above-said first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 9.7.2024

¶17

Shukla

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pradeep v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Harshendra Singh @ Raja Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Shyam Bihari @ Shyam Kishor Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Prajapati Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Satyapal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Kailash Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Rajendra Gupta Third Bail Vs State of U.P.