Allowed

Alagu v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Allahabad HC23 Feb 2024BAIL/2132/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Sections 363, 302, 201 and 120B IPC for alleged kidnapping and murder. Court granted bail on parity with an identically situated co-accused already released, noting the applicant had no criminal history and had been in custody since November 2023.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bonds and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each, with conditions to attend hearings, refrain from similar offences, and not tamper with evidence.

Alagu vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:32818

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2132 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Alagu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava,Vineet Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶8

The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 247 of 2023, under Sections 363,302,201,120B IPC, Police Station Khodare, District Gonda.

¶9

It is argued that the co-accused with similar allegations, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 26.4.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3171 of 2024.

¶10

Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶11

Considering the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 1.11.2023, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant- Alagu be released on bail in the aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

¶16

facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Order Date :- 26.4.2024 Shravan

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Alagu v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagu v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohsin Raza Vs State of Up. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sadhna Bajpai Vs State of U.P., Thru. Prin. the Secy. Home Deptt., Civil Secrtt. Lko.

Salman Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Ram Chander Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Sahibey Alam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Santlal Alias Santram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others