Allowed

Sunil v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2024BAIL/1797/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application (No. 1797 of 2024) filed by Sunil against the State of U.P. The Allahabad High Court allowed the application and granted bail in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each subject to conditions of attending hearings, not committing similar offences, and not tampering w

Sunil vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21382

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1797 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sunil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.203 of 2023, under Section 2(b)(i)/ (3)(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Atariya, District Sitapur.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the solitary case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record. The applicant is in custody since 29.11.2023.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Sunil be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 11.3.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sunil v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Islam @ Munna Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow

Md. Azam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt., Lko.

Pintu Vs State of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Neta Prasad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Deshraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vijay Agarwal @ Golu @ Vijay Kaliya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.