Allowed

Islam @ Munna v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2024/499/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the applicant, Islam @ Munna, in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, considering his prior bail and co-accused being on bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each subject to undertaking to appear in court, not commit offences, and not interfere with evidence or witnesses.

Islam @ Munna Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14222

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 499 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Islam @ Munna Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Akhtar Husain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in all the cases shown in the gang chart.He further submits that the applicant is also on bail in other cases not shown in the gang chart. He further submits that the coaccused has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 01.02.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1135 of 2024. The applicant is in custody since 11.12.2023.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart and the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Islam @ Munna be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 848 of 2023, under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kotwali City, District Hardoi, on his

¶11

furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶14

and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 16.2.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Islam @ Munna v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Islam @ Munna v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sonu Alias Ajit Raidas Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Gurjeet Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Imran Ali Vs State of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Md. Azam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt., Lko.

Pintu Vs State of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Shiv Nath Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Food and Civil Supply Civil Secrt. Lko. and 2 Other