Allowed

Mohd. Hasnain v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC20 Dec 2024BAIL/13251/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, considered a bail application under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court allowed the prayer, noting the applicant was already on bail in associated gang chart cases. Release is conditional on personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail under Crim./FIR No. 0083/2024 via personal bonds and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Mohd. Hasnain vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:86045

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13251 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Mohd. Hasnain Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Jabir,Tribhuwan Agnihotri,Vineet Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in all the 10 cases shown in the gang chart.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Mohd. Husnain be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 0083 of 2024, under Sections 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Jaidpur, District Barabanki, on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence

¶13

similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission;

¶14

and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Arun

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd. Hasnain v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Hasnain v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shahnwaz Alam Vs Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory andOR

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Thru. Chief Divisional Mgr. Vs Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. and Ors.

Satish Chandra Agarwal Vs Addl. District Judge-Iii, Lucknow and Others

Parshuram and Another vs Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-Ii, Faizabad/Ayodhya and 4 Others

Ram Gopal Gupta vs Smt. Sheela Shukla

Farhat Irshad alias Nida vs Mohammad Anas