Allowed

Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu v. State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC2 Feb 2024BAIL/1202/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) allowed the bail application of the accused applicant in a CPL case involving IPC sections 324, 302, 504, and 506, noting that specific allegations were levelled against a co-accused and the applicant had only old criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of similar amount, undertaking to attend hearings and not commit similar offences or tamper with

Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu vs State of U.P Thru. Addil… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:55099

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1202 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Prem Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.53 of 2023 under sections 324, 302, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Maharua, District Ambedkar Nagar.

¶8

It is argued by the counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Raman Singh was enlarged on bail vide order dated 07.08.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14868 of 2023.

¶9

While granting the bail to the said co-accused, the court had noticed that the main allegation was levelled against the one of the co-accused Vinay Kumar Singh of causing injuries by the use of Banka.

¶10

As regards the applicant, general allegations were levelled. Specific allegations were levelled against the co-accused Vinay Kumar Singh.

¶11

Considering the fact that general allegations were levelled against the applicant and apparently there appears to be no motive at the instance of the applicant to cause of the offence in question, the applicant whose criminal antecedents are explained in para 24 of the bail application which are old cases, are entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.

¶12

7 Let the applicant Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the

¶15

offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶16

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Order Date :- 9.8.2024 VNP/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu v. State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Pratap Singh @ Deepu v. State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sandeep Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow

Billa @ Raja Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Shivam Pathak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Baba @ Jagmohan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Secrett. Lko. and Others

Suraj Pratap Rai Alias Suraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Guddu @ Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others