National Highway Authority of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow v. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 86 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highway Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Rajesh Kumar Tiwari And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Tewari
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Harish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate submits that on account of death of Shri Vijay Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the appellant, he will appear on behalf of the appellant and file his Vakalatnama and objection for condonation of delay.
List after two weeks.
Shri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant is present.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 28.11.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
National Highway Authority Of India
- respondent
Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARPLD/86/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court