The Court granted two weeks to the respondent to file objections to the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, allowing one week thereafter for the appellant to file a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 85 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highway Authoirty Of India Thru. Project Director Respondent :- Arvind Kumar Yadav And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Vimlesh Kumar
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Durgesh Kumar Tewari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate submits that he would appear and file Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents no.1 and 2.
Shri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has served the copy of appeal on the counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2.
As prayed by learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, two week's time is granted to file objection. One week's time thereafter shall be available to the learned counsel for the appellant to file rejoinder affidavit/reply, if any.
List thereafter.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 18.4.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
National Highway Authority Of India Thru. Project Director
Arvind Kumar Yadav And Ors
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
