The second judge disposed of an appeal in absence of the appellant, finding no representation to press the appeal or request for adjournment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 417 of 2011
Appellant :- Smt. Usha Devi And Ors. Respondent :- Siraj Khan And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Rajesh Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- B C Pandey,M.L. Syal,Shashi Kiran Arya
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None appeared on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 28.11.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Usha Devi And Ors.
Siraj Khan And Another
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
