National Highways Authority of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow v. Hausala Prasad and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 42 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highways Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Hausala Prasad And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Vimlesh Kumar
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate submits that he has filed Vakalatnama in this case on behalf of respondent no.1. Shri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant has provided a copy of the application to him.
Office to verify and print the name of Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate as counsel for the respondent in the cause list.
He prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file objection. One week's time thereafter shall be available to the learned counsel for the appellant to file reply, if any.
List thereafter.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 19.2.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
National Highways Authority Of India
- respondent
Hausala Prasad
- other
National Highways Authority Of India
- other
Vijay Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARPLD/42/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajnish Kumar
- Order 2 · Rajnish Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court