In an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, this court noted deficiency in court fees and defects. The court directed listing for a fresh report as defects may not have been cured.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 120 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highways Authority Of India Thru. Project Director Respondent :- Ravindra And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report there was deficiency of court fees alongwith other defects.
Shri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has removed the defects and paid the court fees but there is no report in this regard and the receipt uploaded by learned counsel for the appellant is also not readable.
List with report on 16.12.2024 as fresh.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 12.12.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
National Highways Authority Of India
Ravindra And Others
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
