In a per incuriam observation during listing, the Bench noted the appellant deposited court fees but no report on sufficiency exists. The court listed the matter for a fresh hearing with a report on the sufficiency of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 No. - 77 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highway Authority Of India Thru. Project Director Respondent :- Nirbay Pandey And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the court fees has been deposited, however there is no report in regard to sufficiency of court fees.
List in the first week of January, 2025 as fresh with report.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 16.12.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the deposit of court fees without a report on sufficiency defeats the maintainability of the appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
National Highway Authority Of India Thru. Project Director
Nirbay Pandey And Others
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
