Applicants sought appointment of an arbitrator after dispute-resolution and arbitrator-appointment notices went unanswered. Respondents did not object but disagreed on proposed arbitrators. The court appointed a retired Additional District Judge as arbitrator, pending disclosure and consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 20 of 2024
Applicant :- Omveer Singh And Another Opposite Party :- Sufiyan And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Madhusudan Srivastava,Madhav Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Kritika Thakur
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
[Rajnish Kumar,J.]
Order Date :- 1.10.2024 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an independent arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the dispute arising from an agreement dated 22.03.2018.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Omveer Singh And Another
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
