Second appeal dismissed as abated. The single judge held that the appeal abates against respondent nos.1 due to death without substitution and against respondent nos.2 and 3 due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21265
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 123 of 2004
Appellant :- Ram Avadh And Anr. Respondent :- Ram Pher And 2 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Sampurnanand Counsel for Respondent :- Sharad Nandan Ojha
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List revised. None is present on behalf of the appellants to press the appeal.
Sri Sharad Nandan Ojha, learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent no.1 has died and despite the application for abatement, no substitution has been moved.
In view of above, this appeal stands abated against the respondent no.1.
Dismissed accordingly as abated against the respondent no.1 and for non- prosecution against the respondent nos.2 and 3.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.3.2024 Akanksha
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Avadh And Anr.
Ram Pher And 2 Ors.
Rajnish Kumar,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
