Disposed

Rahul Agrahari v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC15 Oct 2024ABAIL/9886/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. The applicant was directed to file a regular bail application guided by Justice Antil, Surrendered within one month, and no coercive action was to be taken during this period.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; direction to surrender within one month; direction to file regular bail application.

Rahul Agrahari vs State of Up and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:193454

¶2

Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9886 of 2024 Applicant :- Rahul Agrahari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Zafar Yab Khan,Shahroze Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶4

List has been revised.

¶5

Heard Sri Shahroze Khan, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant today is taken on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.1285 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 307, 332, 353, 379 I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Itwa, District Siddharth Nagar.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

Order Date :- 10.12.2024/Sumit S

¶12

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul Agrahari v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Agrahari v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Fateh Mohammad vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sunil vs State of Up and Another

Rahul vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Satish Kumar Bharti vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhiruddin Chuadhary Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow

Mahendra Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko